EORTC 1409 GITCG/ESSO 01 - A prospective colorectal liver metastasis database for borderline or initially unresectable diseases (CLIMB): Lessons learnt from real life. From paradigm to unmet need.

AIM: Multidisciplinary management of metastatic colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is still challenging. To assess postoperative complications in initially unresectable or borderline resectable CRLM, the prospective EORTC-1409 ESSO 01-CLIMB trial capturing 'real-life data' of European centres specialized in liver surgery was initiated. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 219 patients were registered between May 2015 and January 2019 from 15 centres in nine countries. Eligible patients had borderline or initially unresectable CRLM assessed by pre-operative multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT). Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, 30-day and 90-days mortality post-surgery, and quality indicators. We report the final results of the 151 eligible patients that underwent at least one liver surgery. RESULTS: Perioperative chemotherapy with or without targeted treatment were administered in 100 patients (69.4%). One stage resection (OSR) was performed in 119 patients (78.8%). Two stage resections (TSR, incl. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)) were completed in 24 out of 32 patients (75%). Postoperative complications were reported in 55.5% (95% CI: 46.1-64.6%), 64.0% (95% CI: 42.5-82%), and 100% (95% CI: 59-100%) of the patients in OSR, TSR and ALPPS, respectively. Post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 6.7%, 20.0%, and 28.6% in OSR, TSR, and ALPPS, respectively. In total, four patients (2.6%) died after surgery. CONCLUSION: Across nine countries, OSR was more often performed than TSR and tended to result in less postoperative complications. Despite many efforts to register patients across Europe, it is still challenging to set up a prospective CRLM database.

Resección hepática laparoscópica versus hepatectomía abierta para lesiones benignas: estudio comparativo con propensity score matching / Laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for benign lesions: a comparative study with propensity score matching

RESUMEN Antecedentes : las ventajas de la hepatectomía videolaparoscópica (HVL) hicieron que gane cada vez más campo para el tratamiento de los tumores hepáticos benignos (THB). Objetivo : comparar los resultados perioperatorios de pacientes sometidos a HVL con los de los operados con hepatectomía abierta (HA) por THB, emparejados con propensity score matching (PSM). Material y métodos : estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y comparativo de HA y HVL por THB entre agosto de 2010 y junio de 2021. Se analizaron variables demográficas, preoperatorias, intraoperatorias y posoperatorias. Para evitar sesgos de las distintas covariables entre los grupos se realizó un PSM 1:1. Resultados : de 403 hepatectomías, se analizaron 82 por THB. De ellas 36 (44%) fueron HA y 46 (56%) HVL. Edad media 45 ±14 años, 65% mujeres. Tras realizar el PSM, quedaron dos grupos de 28 pacientes cada uno. En HA, 5 (18%) pacientes requirieron transfusiones y ninguno en HVL (p = 0,01). Las complicaciones mayores se presentaron en 4 (14%) pacientes en HA, y ninguna en HVL (p = 0,03). Se reoperaron 4 (14%) pacientes con HA y ningún paciente con HVL (p = 0,03). La estadía hospitalaria total fue significativamente mayor en las HA (p = 0,04). No se registraron muertes a los 90 días en ninguno de los dos grupos. Conclusión : la HVL por THB es una técnica segura y eficaz, ya que los pacientes presentaron menor requerimiento transfusional, número de reoperaciones, de complicaciones mayores y de estadía hospitalaria que con HA. Por las ventajas encontradas, la HVL podría ser considerada la técnica de elección en cirugía por THB.

ABSTRACT Background : The advantages of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have increased its use for the treatment of benign liver tumors (BLTs). Objective : The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing LLR with those operated on with open liver resection (OLR) for BLTs using propensity score matching (PSM). Material and methods : We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study comparing OLRs with LLRs performed between August 2010 and June 2021. The demographic, perioperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables were analyzed. We used PSM with 1:1 matching to avoid biases of the different covariates between the groups. Results : Of 303 liver resections, 82 corresponded to BLTs and were included in the analysis; 36 (44%) were OLRs and 46 (56%) were LLRs. Mean age was 45 ±14 years and 65% were women. After PSM, two groups of 28 patients each were constituted. Five patients (18%) in the OLR group and none in the LLR required transfusions (p = 0.01). Major complications, occurred in 4 (14%) patients in the OLR group and in no cases in the LLR group (p = 0.03). Four (14%) undergoing OLR required reoperation versus no patients with LLR (p = 0.03). Total length of hospital stay was significantly longer in OLR (p = 0.04). There were no deaths in any of the groups within 90 days. Conclusion : LLR for BLTs is a safe and effective technique, with lower requirement for transfusions, fewer reoperations and major complications and shorter length of hospital stay than OLR, Therefore, LLR could be considered the surgical technique of choice for BLTs.

Bases anatómicas y aplicación clínica inicial del abordaje glissoniano intrahepático en las hepatectomías / Anatomical bases and initial clinical application of the intrahepatic Glissonian approach in hepatectomies / Bases anatômicas e aplicação clínica inicial da abordagem glissoniana intra-hepática em hepatectomias

Introducción: El control pedicular durante las resecciones hepáticas puede hacerse mediante disección hiliar extrahepática (DHE) o abordaje glissoniano (AG). El AG intrahepático (AGI) según técnica de Machado puede brindar ciertas ventajas, especialmente en disecciones difíciles. Sin embargo, es menos empleado que la DHE. Objetivo: Analizar las bases anatómicas del AGI y comunicar nuestra experiencia clínica inicial. Material y métodos : El AGI según técnica de Machado se practicó en seis (6) hígados cadavéricos. Luego se hizo la disección hepática para valorar la efectividad del cargado pedicular y medir la profundidad de los diferentes pedículos glissonianos. La aplicación clínica de la técnica fue gradual y selectiva, aplicándola cuando nos parecía factible y que aportaba alguna ventaja sobre la DHE. Resultados: en los 6 hígados cadavéricos fue posible realizar el cargado de todos los pedículos glissonianos (lobares y sectoriales bilateralmente, así como los segmentarios izquierdos). Estos se encuentran a una profundidad menor a 2 cm de la capsula hepática, siendo accesibles para su control mediante AGI. La principal excepción es el pedículo anterior derecho, cuyo nacimiento es más profundo, lo que asociado a su origen en sentido cefálico y a veces ramificado, puede hacer más difícil su cargado. La aplicación del AGI se llevo a cabo en 5 pacientes, en todos fue efectiva, insumió poco tiempo y no tuvo complicaciones intraoperatorias. Conclusiones: el AGI según técnica de Machado es un procedimiento sistematizado, reproducible, factible y seguro, aún en su aplicación clínica inicial. El conocimiento anatómico de los pedículos glissonianos es fundamental para llevarlo a cabo con éxito.

Introduction: Pedicle control during liver resections can be done by extrahepatic hilar dissection (EHD) or the Glissonian approach (GA). Intrahepatic GA (IGA) according to the Machado technique can offer certain advantages, especially in difficult dissections. However, it is used less than the DHE. Objective : to analyze the anatomical bases of the IGA and to communicate our initial clinical experience. Material and methods : IGA according to the Machado technique was performed on six (6) cadaveric livers. Liver dissection was then performed to assess the effectiveness of pedicle loading and measure the depth of the different Glissonian pedicles. The clinical application of the technique was gradual and selective, applying it when it seemed feasible and that it provided some advantage over DUS. Results : in the 6 cadaveric livers it was possible to load all the Glissonian pedicles (lobar and sectoral bilaterally, as well as the left segmental ones). These are found at a depth of less than 2 cm from the hepatic capsule, being accessible for control by IGA. The main exception is the right anterior pedicle, whose origin is deeper, which, associated with its cephalad and sometimes branched origin, can make it more difficult to load. The application of the IGA was carried out in 5 patients, in all of them it was effective, it took little time and there were no intraoperative complications. Conclusions: the IGA according to the Machado technique is a systematic, reproducible, feasible and safe procedure, even in its initial clinical application. The anatomical knowledge of the Glissonian pedicles is essential to carry it out successfully.

Introdução: o controle pedicular durante as ressecções hepáticas pode ser feito por dissecção hilar extra-hepática (DHE) ou abordagem Glissoniana (AG). A AG intra-hepática (AGI) segundo a técnica de Machado pode oferecer algumas vantagens, principalmente em dissecções difíceis. No entanto, é usado menos do que o DHE. Objetivo: Analisar as bases anatômicas da AGI e comunicar nossa experiência clínica inicial. Material e métodos : A AGI segundo a técnica de Machado foi realizada em seis (6) fígados cadavéricos. A dissecção do fígado foi então realizada para avaliar a eficácia da carga pedicular e medir a profundidade dos diferentes pedículos Glissonianos. A aplicação clínica da técnica foi gradativa e seletiva, aplicando-a quando parecia viável e que proporcionava alguma vantagem sobre o USD. Resultados: nos 6 fígados cadavéricos foi possível carregar todos os pedículos Glissonianos (lobares e setoriais bilateralmente, assim como os segmentares esquerdos). Estes são encontrados a menos de 2 cm da cápsula hepática, sendo acessíveis para controle por AGI. A principal exceção é o pedículo anterior direito, cuja origem é mais profunda, o que, associado à sua origem cefálica e por vezes ramificada, pode dificultar o carregamento. A aplicação da AGI foi realizada em 5 pacientes, em todos foi eficaz, em pouco tempo e sem complicações intraoperatórias. Conclusões : AGI segundo a técnica de Machado é um procedimento sistemático, reprodutível, factível e seguro, mesmo em sua aplicação clínica inicial. O conhecimento anatômico dos pedículos Glissonianos é essencial para realizá-lo com sucesso.

Impact of Positive Radial Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

In resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), positive ductal margin (DM) is associated with poor survival. There is currently little knowledge about the impact of positive radial margin (RM) when DM is negative. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and the role of positive RM. Patients who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017 where retrospectively reviewed and stratified according to margin positivity: an isolated RM-positive group and DM ± RM group. Of the 75 patients identified; 34 (45.3%) had R1 resection and 17 had positive RM alone. Survival was poorer in patients with R1 resection compared to R0 (p = 0.019). After stratification according to margin positivity; R0 patients showed better survival than DM ± RM-positive patients (p = 0.004; MST 43.9 vs. 23.6 months), but comparable to RM-positive patients (p = 0.361; MST 43.9 vs. 39.5 months). Recurrence was higher in DM ± RM group compared to R0 (p = 0.0017; median disease-free survival (DFS) 15 vs. 30 months); but comparable between RM and R0 group (p = 0.39; DFS 20 vs. 30 months). In univariate and multivariate analysis, DM positivity resulted as a negative prognostic factor both for survival and recurrence. In conclusion, positive RM resections appear to have different recurrence patterns and survival rates than positive DM resections.

Towards Standardization of Liver Resections in India: Five Hundred Consecutive Oncological Liver Resections- Trends, Techniques and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To study the trends, techniques, outcomes and improvisations of liver resections over the study period. METHODS: We analysed prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing liver resections for oncological indications at Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India from June 2010 to October 2016. RESULTS: Five hundred sixteen patients were operated with median age of 55 years and male to female ratio of 1.6:1. Most commonly operated neoplasms were hepatocellular carcinoma (N = 166), cholangiocarcinoma (N = 72) and metastases from colorectal cancer (N = 129). We performed 219 major hepatic resections (≥3 segments) with overall morbidity of 22.9% (N = 118) and mortality of 4.0% (N = 21). Complex hepatectomies were performed in 78 patients. In order to study the time trends, data was divided into pre-liver clinic era and post liver clinic era. Trend analysis showed improvements in complication grade, hospital stay, blood loss, and overall survival status in post liver clinic era. Liver transection in all our patients was carried out without Pringle manoeuvre under normotensive anaesthesia, only 0.7% of our patients had significant transaminitis beyond POD 5. CONCLUSION: A dedicated multidisciplinary treatment approach along with standardization of liver resections culminates into optimal treatment outcomes.

A retrospective pilot study to examine the feasibility of real-time navigation for laparoscopic liver resections in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using fusion indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, PINPOINT, a novel laparoscopic fusion indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (IGFI) system has become available for laparoscopic liver resection. This study aims to characterize fluorescence patterns of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) using the negative counterstaining method in laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomies of ICC. METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients, diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and underwent laparoscopic liver resection between April 2017 and December 2018, were retrospectively reviewed. A laparoscopic IGFI navigation system was used to characterize fluorescence patterns of ICC with intraoperative liver segment demarcation by means of negative counterstaining. RESULTS: Fusion IGFI of ICC was successfully obtained from all 11 patients from the surgical specimens. The fluorescence patterns of ICC can be categorized into rim-type fluorescence and segmental fluorescence, depending on tumor growth. In eight patients, indocyanine green fluorescence imaging was used to identify the hepatic lobes or segments by negative counterstaining. In six cases, a valid and persistent demarcation was achieved intraoperatively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic IGFI system could identify different types of ICC lesions and may facilitate real-time navigation for laparoscopic anatomic liver resection of ICC.

Open versus laparoscopic hepatectomies within an ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) program. Are there differences?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic procedures have gained popularity because they favor a faster recovery. In the same way, the establishment of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in major abdominal surgery has shortened the hospital stay. There are several studies that report the results on ERAS programs applied to open or laparoscopic hepatectomies or comparing one of them with the classic approach but few have compared the results between both within an ERAS program. OBJECTIVE: To compare the results between open and laparoscopic hepatectomies in the same ERAS program. METHOD: Thirty-six patients undergoing hepatectomies were enrolled in this study and were either laparoscopically or open in an identical ERAS program. Hospital stay and the number of complications were taken as primary end points. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between both groups in terms of hospital stay or number of complications. The differences were in a shorter time of surgery and an earlier ambulation in favor of open surgery and a better full recovery in favor of the laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Initial data suggest that there would be no benefits in terms of hospital stay and complication rate of laparoscopic hepatectomies over open ones within an ERAS program.

ANTECEDENTES: Los procedimientos laparoscópicos ganaron popularidad porque favorecen una recuperación rápida. El establecimiento de programas ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) en cirugía mayor abdominal ha acortado la estancia hospitalaria independientemente de la vía de abordaje. Varios trabajos informan los resultados sobre programas ERAS aplicados a hepatectomías abiertas o laparoscópicas, o comparando una de ellas con el abordaje clásico, pero pocos han comparado los resultados entre ambas dentro de un programa ERAS. OBJETIVO: Comparar, dentro un mismo programa ERAS, los resultados entre hepatectomías abiertas y laparoscópicas. MÉTODO: Se incorporaron a este estudio 36 pacientes sometidos a hepatectomías que fueron abordados por vía laparoscópica o abierta dentro de un programa ERAS. Los objetivos primarios fueron la estancia hospitalaria y el número de complicaciones. RESULTADOS: No hubo diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en cuanto a estancia hospitalaria ni número de complicaciones. Las diferencias radicaron en un menor tiempo de cirugía y una deambulación más precoz a favor de la cirugía abierta, y una recuperación total mejor a favor del abordaje laparoscópico. CONCLUSIONES: Los datos iniciales sugieren que no habría beneficios en cuanto a estancia hospitalaria e índice de complicaciones de las hepatectomías laparoscópicas sobre las abiertas dentro de un programa ERAS.

Resultados de la aplicación de un programa Enhanced Recovery (ERP) en resecciones hepáticas abiertas / Results of the implementation of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) in open liver resections

Antecedentes: los programas fast-track en cirugía hepática muestran ventajas con respecto al manejo perioperatorio tradicional al favorecer principalmente una disminución de la estancia hospitalaria y, por ende, de los costos hospitalarios. Material y métodos: en un estudio observacional y descriptivo se analizan resecciones hepáticas abiertas dentro de un programa de recuperación rápida, haciendo especial hincapié en la adherencia a este, la recuperación total de los enfermos, la morbilidad y la estancia hospitalaria. Resultados: se realizaron 32 hepatectomías en 30 pacientes, 27 de los cuales fueron oncológicos. La adherencia al programa utilizado fue del 78,1% y la recuperación total al momento del alta del 75%. La morbilidad fue del 12,5% y las complicaciones fueron de baja complejidad, aunque 2 pacientes necesitaron reingresar. La estancia hospitalaria tuvo una media de 3,4 días y, sumando los reingresos, de 3,6 días. Conclusión: la aplicación de un ERP en cirugía hepática no solo es factible sino trae aparejada como principal beneficio una disminución en la estancia hospitalaria y, por ende, de los costos. Pero no estamos convencidos de que un ERP mejore la morbilidad de los pacientes.

Background: Background: Fast-track programs in liver surgery offer advantages over traditional perioperative management, particularly in terms of reducing length of hospital stay and hospital costs. Material and methods: We conducted an observational and descriptive analysis of patients undergoing open liver resections as part of an enhanced recovery program. Adherence to the program, full recovery of the patients, complications and length of hospital stay were assessed. Results: A total of 32 liver resections were performed in 30 patients, 27 with cancer. The adherence to the program was 78.1% and full recovery on discharge was 75%. The incidence of complications was 12.5%; most of them were not severe but two patients required rehospitalization. Mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days and 3.6 days when readmissions were considered. Conclusion: The implementation of an ERP after liver resections is feasible and offers advantages in terms of reducing length of hospital stay and hospital costs. We do not think that ERP improves morbidity in these patients.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy: Analysis of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Effectiveness in a High-Volume Center.

BACKGROUND: Considering the increasing evidence on the feasibility of laparoscopic major hepatectomies (LMH), their clinical outcomes and associated costs were herein evaluated compared to open (OMH). METHODS: Major contributors of perioperative expenses were considered. With respect to the occurrence of conversion, a primary intention-to-treat analysis including conversions in the LMH group (ITT-A) was performed. An additional per-protocol analysis excluding conversions (PP-A) was undertaken, with calculation of additional costs of conversion analysis. RESULTS: One hundred forty-five LMH and 61 OMH were included (14.5% conversion rate). At the ITT-A, LMH showed lower blood loss (p < 0.001) and morbidity (global p 0.037, moderate p 0.037), shorter hospital stay (p 0.035), and a lower need for intra- and postoperative red blood cells transfusions (p < 0.001), investigations (p 0.004), and antibiotics (p 0.002). The higher intraoperative expenses (+ 32.1%, p < 0.001) were offset by postoperative savings (- 27.2%, p 0.030), resulting in a global cost-neutrality of LMH (- 7.2%, p 0.807). At the PP-A, completed LMH showed also lower severe complications (p 0.042), interventional procedures (p 0.027), and readmission rates (p 0.031), and postoperative savings increased to - 71.3% (p 0.003) resulting in a 29.9% cost advantage of completed LMH (p 0.020). However, the mean additional cost of conversion was significant. CONCLUSIONS: Completed LMH exhibit a high potential treatment effect compared to OMH and are associated to significant cost savings. Despite some of these benefits may be jeopardized by conversion, a program of LMH can still provide considerable clinical benefits without cost disadvantage and appears worth to be implemented in high-volume centers.

Extending resectability of hilar cholangiocarcinomas: how can it be assessed and improved?

Until the 1980's, Klatskin tumors were considered 'desperate cases' and most of them were not resected; almost no oncologic concept was available. After many improvements, today, extended hepatectomy, including caudate lobe resection and lymphoadenectomy, have become a standard of care for oncologicaly radical resection of Klatskin tumors. Portal vein en bloc resection, if necessary, is a diffused standard assuring R0-resection without any improvement of survival in most series. Arterial resection remains episodical and controversial in its oncologic impact. Arterial resection-reconstruction was demonstrated to be feasible with many different technical possibilities. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, refinement of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy and liver transplantations are some possible future resources for treatment of those aggressive tumors that could be able to expand the pool of treatable patients.

[Metástasis hepáticas sincrónicas de cáncer colorrectal. ¿Resección simultánea o diferida?] / Synchronous liver metastases from colorectal origin. Simultaneous or staged resection?

INTRODUCCIÓN: El 20-40% de las metástasis hepáticas de origen colorrectal son de tipo sincrónico. Actualmente existen tres estrategias quirúrgicas; dos de ellas proponen resecciones diferidas, y la otra, la resección simultánea. OBJETIVO: evaluar los resultados a corto y largo plazo de las resecciones simultáneas. MÉTODO: Evaluamos 212 metástasis hepáticas sincrónicas resecadas en dos centros y comparamos las intervenidas de forma simultánea con aquellas de manera diferida. Evaluamos las características demográficas, las resecciones hepáticas y las características de las metástasis. También evaluamos la morbimortalidad. RESULTADOS: Fueron resecados de manera simultánea con el tumor primario 63 pacientes, y no hubo diferencias significativas en las características demográficas. Hubo más resecciones mayores (p = 0.005) en el grupo de las diferidas. La morbimortalidad fue comparable. La insuficiencia hepática (p = 0.037) fue mayor en el grupo de las diferidas. La morbilidad fue del 33.2% en las diferidas y del 10.1% en las simultáneas (p = 0.256). La mortalidad fue del 2.83% en las diferidas y del 0.94% en las simultáneas (p = 0.508). CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados a corto y largo plazo en ambos grupos son similares. Queda el interrogante de si la necesidad de una hepatectomía mayor favorecería la elección de un tratamiento diferido. INTRODUCTION: Between 20 and 40% of liver metastases from colorectal tumor are synchronous. Three types of surgical approaches are proposed; two of them propose a deferred resection and the other, simultaneous resection. The aim of this analysis is to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of simultaneous resections. METHOD: 212 synchronous liver metastases resected in two centers were evaluated. Comparison between those resected simultaneously with those that were in a deferred way was made. Demographics, liver resections and metastatic characteristics were evaluated. Morbidity and mortality of both alternatives are also evaluated. RESULTS: 63 patients were resected simultaneously with the primary tumor, there were no significant differences in demographic characteristics. There was a greater number of major resections (p = 0.005) in the deferred group. Morbidity and mortality was comparable in both groups. Liver failure (p = 0.037) was higher in the deferred group. Morbidity was 33.2% in the deferred and 10.1% for the simultaneous (p = 0.256). Mortality rate was 2.83% in the deferred and 0.94% in the simultaneous group (p = 0.508). CONCLUSION: Short and long-term outcomes for both groups are similar. A question remains to be answered: the need of a major hepatectomy will favor the election of a deferred treatment?

Anatomía quirúrgica y radiológica del hígado: fundamentos para las resecciones hepáticas / Radiological and surgical anatomy of the liver and fundamentals of the various options liver resections

RESUMEN: El hígado es un órgano sólido, de gran relevancia para la fisiología. Es asiento potencial de lesiones tumorales quísticas y sólidas; benignas y malignas (primarias y secundarias); razón por la cual, conocer su anatomía radiológica y quirúrgica es muy relevante. Los antecedentes históricos comienzan con Berta en 1716, quien fue el primero en realizar una resección hepática; en 1888, Lagenbuch fue el primero el realizar una resección hepática programada. En 1889, Keen realizó la primera lobectomía hepática izquierda, seguido de Webde, en 1910, quien ejecutó la primera lobectomía hepática derecha. Más tarde, Couinaud, en 1957, realizó ua descripción completa de la anatomía segmentaria del hígado, dando una mejor comprensión quirúrgica de la morfología hepática, para su abordaje en distintas patologías. Un hito fundamental en el desarrollo del estudio del hígado, fue el establecimiento de la "Clasificación de Brisbane", por parte del Comité Científico de la Asociación Internacional Hepatobilio-Pancreática, poniendo fin a la confusión terminológica establecida entre los términos franceses y anglosajones. Y desde el ámbito anatómico, se destaca la aparición de Terminologia Anatomica, por parte del Programa Federativo Internacional de Terminologia Anatomica (FIPAT) dependiente de la Federación Internacional de Asociaciones de Anatomistas (IFAA), quienes dentro de la misma, establecieron los términos anatómicos correspondientes al hígado. El objetivo de este manuscrito, es entregar un resumen esquemático de la anatomía quirúrgica y radiológica del hígado, que fundamentan las diferentes opciones de resecciones hepáticas.

SUMMARY: The liver is a solid organ which is most relevant for physiology. It is a potential site for cystic and solid (primary and secondary) benign and malignant tumor lesions. Therefore, thorough knowledge of its radiological and surgical anatomy is important. Historical background of liver resections began with Berta in 1716, who was the first to carry out the procedure. In 1888, Lagenbuch performed the first programmed liver resection and subsequently, in 1889 Keen performed the very first left hepatic lobectomy, followed by Webde in 1910, who performed the first right hepatic lobectomy. Later in 1957, Couinaud recorded a complete description of the segmental anatomy of the liver, providing a greater surgical understanding of the hepatic morphology, for approach in various pathologies. A fundamental milestone in the development of the liver study was the establishment of the "Brisbane Classification" by the Scientific Committee of the International Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Association, which ended previous confusion between the French and Anglo-Saxon terminology. Furthermore, within the scope of anatomy, the introduction of Terminología Anatómica, by the International Federative Program of Anatomical Terminology (FIPAT) which depends on the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists ( IFAA), established the anatomical terms for the liver The objective of this manuscript is to provide a schematic summary of the surgical and radiological anatomy of the liver, on which the different options for liver resections are based.

Experiencia de diez años en resecciones hepáticas / Ten years experience in hepatic resections

Revisamos experiencia reciente y resultados obtenidos con resecciones hepáticas mayores en pacientes referidos a nuestra institución. Revisión retrospectiva de historias clínicas de pacientes entre agosto de 1998 y agosto de 2008, con el objetivo de precisar el tipo de cirugía efectuada, indicaciones principales, complicaciones y morbimortalidad operatoria. 22 pacientes cuyas historias estuvieron disponibles para revisión. La principal indicación de cirugía fueron neoplasias malignas 86,4% de los casos, las metástasis de carcinoma colorrectal (7) la primera indicación seguida de hepatocarcinoma (4). Otras indicaciones incluyeron: colangiocarcinomas perifericos (2), metástasis de tumores neuroendocrinos (2), diversas lesiones benignas (3) otros tumores (4). La hepatectomía derecha y segmentectomías anatómicas fueron los más frecuentes con un 27,3 % cada uno, seguidos de segmentectomía lateral izquierda (II y III) en 19%. El tiempo operatorio promedio fue 270,4 min (rango: 180-560 min). El promedio de estancia hospitalaria fue 7,7 días (rango:4-30). El 8% de nuestros pacientes no requirió estancia posoperatoria inmediata en UTI. La tasa de complicaciones fue 44,5% siendo el derrame pleural reactivo y el sangrado posoperatorio más frecuentes. La tasa de reintervención fue 18,2%. La mortalidad global fue 9% (2/22), y la inherente al procedimiento quirúrgico 4,5% (1/22). Las resecciones hepáticas mayores son un procedimiento relevante en el armamento del cirujano oncólogo dedicado al tratamiento de neoplasias digestivas, la morbimortalidad operatoria en nuestra institución es similar a otros centros de mayor volumen a nivel internacional.

Review the recent experience and results of major hepatic resections of patients treated at our institution. Retrospective review of clinical records patients submitted to major hepatic resection inten years, between August 1998 to August 2008, with descriptive statistics of type of surgery, indications, complications and surgical related morbimortality. Twenty two patients with complete clinical records for review were included. The main indication for surgery were malignant neoplasms in 86,4% of the cases,being colorectal liver metastasis (7) the first one followed by hepatocarcinomas (4). Other indications included:The periferic colanghiocarcinomas (2), metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors (2), varied beningn lesions (3)and other tumors (4). Right hepatectomy and anatomical segmentectomies were the most frequent procedures 27.3% each, followed by left lateral segmentectomy (II - III) in19% of the cases. Medium operative time was 270.4 min (range: 180-560 min). Mean hospital stay was 7.7 days (range: 4-30). 8% of the patients did not required post operative ICU care. Complications rate was 44.5% being reactive pleural effusion and postoperative bleedingthe most frecuent ones. Reintervention rate was 18.2%, global mortality 9% (2/22), and surgical related mortality was 4.5% (1/22). Major hepatic resections are a relevant procedure in the armament of surgical oncologists dedicated to treatment of digestive neoplasms, the number of such procedures done at public institutions are limited. Operative morbimortality in our institution is similar to other major volume centers.

A half century (1961-2011) of applying microsurgery to experimental liver research.

The development of microsurgery has been dependent on experimental animals. Microsurgery could be a very valuable technique to improve experimental models of liver diseases. Microdissection and microsutures are the two main microsurgical techniques that can be considered for classifying the experimental models developed for liver research in the rat. Partial portal vein ligation, extrahepatic cholestasis and hepatectomies are all models based on microdissection. On the other hand, in portacaval shunts, orthotopic liver transplantation and partial heterotopic liver transplantation, the microsuture techniques stand out. By reducing surgical complications, these microsurgical techniques allow for improving the resulting experimental models. If good experimental models for liver research are successfully developed, the results obtained from their study might be particularly useful in patients with liver disease. Therefore experimental liver microsurgery could be an invaluable way to translate laboratory data on liver research into new clinical diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Intraoperative ultrasonography for repeated hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma / 中华肝胆外科杂志

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of intraopèrative ultrasonography (IOUS) on primary and repeated hepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Methods 430 patients underwent 555 operations for HCC.New tumors detected by IOUS at the primary and repeated hepatectomies were retrospectively analyzed.The long-term outcomes were also studied.Results IOUS had the highest sensitivity in the routinely used imaging examinations.The detection rate by each imaging modality decreased slightly but uniformly at the second hepatectomy.IOUS detected 56 new tumors in 30 patients (7.1％) at the primary hepatectomy and 13 new tumors in 8 (7.3％) at the second.The average size of tumor detected was 8.7±3.8 and 9.0±5.2 mm at the primary and second resections,respectively.The preoperative surgical plan was changed due to the IOUS findings alone in 24 patients (5.6％) at the primary hepatectomy,and in 7 (6.4％) at the second.Although recurrence was frequent in patients with new tumors detected at the primary hepatectomy,long-term survival after appropriate treatment for recurrence was similar to those patients without new tumors detected.Conlusions Despite recent progress in imaging modalities,IOUS is still the most sensitive examination.The same degree of precaution is necessary to detect new tumors using IOUS in repeated hepatectomy.Patients with new tumors detected by IOUS are at high risk for recurrence so that regular check-up is important to improve patient survival.

Reseccionea hepáticas en el servicio de cirugía general del Hospital Privado: 13 años de experiencia resecciones hepátidas / Liver resection in hospital privado's general surgery department: 13- year experience liver resections

Las resecciones hepáticas constituyen el tratamiento de elección en las neoplasias hepáticas primárias y en algunos casos de tumores metastáticos, pero conllevan tasas significativas de morbilidad y mortalidad. Objetivo: Presentar nuestra experiencia en cirurgías hepáticas. Material y método: Se incluyeron 40 paciente sometidos a hepatectomías en nuestra Institución desde diciembre de 1991 a diciembre de 2004. Los datos fueron recolectados en forma retrospectiva y analizados mediante método estadístico descriptivo. Resultados: Los diagnósticos incluyeron enfermedades hepáticas primarias benignas (n=9, 22.5%) y malígnas (n=7, 17.5%) y enfermedades hepáticas metastásicas (n=24, 60%). Dentro de las metástasis, la más frecuente fue el adenocarcinoma de colon (n=7, 17.42%). El índice de complicaciones quirúrgicas inmediatas fue del 55% (n=22). Hubo 4 muertees peri-operatorias (10%) y la tasa promedio de estadía hospitalaria fue de 10,8 días. Conclusiones: Nuestros hallazgos demostraron que la indicación más frecuentes de resección hepática en nuestra experiencia es las metástasis de adenocarcinoma de colon y que los resultados observado en nuestra serie son comparables a los obtenidos por otras Instituciones a nivel mundial con similar flujo de pacientes.

Liver resection constitutes the treatment of choice in the liver primary neoplasms and some cases of metastatic tumors, but entail significant morbidity and mortality rates. OBJECTIVE: To present our experience in hepatic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 40 patients who underwent hepatectomies in our Institution from December 1991 through December 2004. The information was collected retrospectively and was analized descriptive and statistically. RESULTS: 40 patients underwent 40 hepatectomies. The diagnosis included primary benign hepatic disease (n= 9, 22.5%), primary hepatic malignancy (n= 7, 17.5%) and metastatic hepatic disease (n= 24, 60%). In the metastatic group, the most frecuent pathology was colonic adenocarcinoma (n= 17, 42%). There were 4 perioperatory deaths (10%) and the average hospitaly stay was 10.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: our data shows that the most frequent indication of hepatic resection in our experience was metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma as compared to the other Institutions with similar experience.